Hugh Hendry issued a new piece. He is always an entertaining and highly recommended read. Especially, if his last opus was almost 2 years ago (he did not have what to say). One of the greatest contrarian thinkers at the moment.
What puzzled me is his love for “stop loss” (which also connects with my recent piece about “sell your losers and ride you winners”). I do not understand it. He gives as an example tragic death of Jesse Livermore, who was right on his macro call but market remained irrational longer than he remained solvent. Volatility killed him (by the way he was shorting the market around 1930) and his panacea could have been stop losses.
I would say that, from what I understood (disclaimer: apart of this article, I know nothing about Jesse Livermore), he was killed not by volatility but by leverage or maybe also asymmetric nature of shorting individual names.
Stop loss is a practical thing to say that I do not understand what I am doing.
If one operates with sufficient margin of safety, even considerable volatility should not scare. It is always advisable to have low expectations. You cannot time the market so that you will always buy in the lowest point. That is impossible. It should be comforting that premature accumulation is a sin of all the greatest value investors.
It takes time for intrinsic value and price to converge. I follow a general rule of 3 years (I took it from Pabrai’s “Dhandho Investor”), which should be enough for your story to play out and admit a mistake. Intrinsic value in most cases is changing slowly – definitely not like when you watch big daily plunges on the stock market.
Lehman produced many stories of 50% plunges and 200-300% recoveries in less than 3 years. I do not know how to be that smart and sell it after e.g. 20% drop, then buy back after 50% down (total) and ride it up 3 or 4x. I do not know people who bet the entire farm back in March of 2009. You are fooling yourself if you think that you will dare to move in the darkest hour.
No comments:
Post a Comment