2013 END NOTES

2013 was fast as probably each year when you get older and especially when you have small kids.

It was a mixed bag for me - stock picking was almost 1.5x better than market but excessive hedge position, obviously, materially lowered the returns. I cannot complain – mid teens with low downside risk is quite good (longs were covered with 1.5x index shorts for most of the year). I would settle for 10% pa with limited risk given the elevated valuations because of high margins and multiples.

As I wrote before, this year I have spent little time on my portfolio. Probably, it was in the spirit of Charlie Munger (documented by Value Investing World): “We use a lot of experience and do it [investment returns] in our heads. We don’t like complexity and we distrust other systems and think it many times leads to false confidence. The harder you work, the more confidence you get. But you may be working hard on something that is false. We’re so afraid of that process so we don’t do it.” Devil is in the details and footnotes but more and more I notice that the first hour of reading gives 80% of thesis. The most important is if I can build a constructive opposite thesis – if I feel that something was overdone with price movement, I act. When I see that insiders are on my side, position gets bigger.

Almost all returns came from 2 boring cellular telcos. No moat, no profit (almost no). Value investors were skeptical. However, in such cases, holding period is not forever and IRRs are quite good. I hope (a very important word) that UNTK and EZPW will be similar.

Macro is another topic hated by value investors. It is an interesting time when long-term interest rates are going up together with homebuilders. Mr. Market is saying that higher interest rates will not affect the recovering housing market.  The money printing was reduced by ~10% and its annualized run rate now totals ~6% of US GDP, while interest rates went up 40-80%. That was a price discovery of roughly 7 months, which will continue.

TNX is 10Y yield, TYX is 30Y yield and XHB - homebuilders.

Many many investors think like me; therefore, it is not that contrarian and quite painful at the same time while it should be painful when alone. They think and act with hedging their portfolios and keep on fighting the last war. Understandably, perma-bears continue to capitulate. Hugh Hendry did that in kind of a funny way. He thinks it will get much much worse but it will get better before that, which is worth a try to gamble. Those who were unhedged are definitely winning, so far. WEB is among them but he is in his own long-term game (he is not exiting the market before crash like the most intend to do). Correct me if I am wrong but the last three horsemen standing are John Hussman, Gary Shilling and Hoisington. Still await for G. Shilling's 2014 outlook, which should come in the first weeks of January. It should be an interesting read because he ended his 2013 mid year views: “So here’s my “risk-off” quartet: short stocks and commodities, long the dollar and Treasuries.” So far, so bad…

I will speculate that surprisingly the world cannot withstand a higher long term interest rates and a complete stop to QE would not anyhow influence rates (I am talking about longer term as in a short term market would correct and people would fly to safety).

This year I started to practice a basket of “option” stocks (stocks, which are priced like options, usually close to $1). I will see if my stock picking instincts are worth a dime as so far the score is 0:2 (thanks to PNCL and GAXC; long DM and ABM.L). However, mathematically, I am sure I should continue. I will decide after 10 or so attempts and positions should be closer to 0.5% (now larger) for now. On the positive note, such things absorb natural inclination towards activity and gamble - modern man needs variety and to have at least some fun. Discipline is boring and painful.

After writing this, I got a little better regarding my short XHB position (hurting in the last few weeks). It is painful but feels like a right thing to do given another interest rates run up attempt, which I believe (a very important word) to be another fake. I should at least reduce it at $28, though. I am afraid for pent up demand and normal household formation, does not matter how slow it is. Something similar to what is going on with autos.

I am intrigued about NLY. LOJN is coming back to a trade-able range.

A few reminders:

> Next crash will come from something not known or too obvious.

> General trend of the market is up - roughly 3/4 of the time. White men will do everything to preserve status quo and inflation is the key element of this. 

> The world has not deleveraged, yet (it is beautiful but takes very long or another 3-6 years, remember EU bank leverage ratios…).

It is getting too long, so Happy New Year!

RANDOM MUSSINGS (iii)

It seems to me that today everyone is a trend follower.  In 2009, everyone was macro economist. And both without apparent reason. It is clear today that the latter was wrong. At least, so far. I think that majority of the first will be trapped, too. Buffett is talking his book and eternal perspective and obviously he is right, so those who can afford to follow his advise, should definitely do that.  The rest at least has to be hedged.

I liked (let's call it) the battle of John Hussman and the Brooklyn Investor on the profit margins (a few additional dimensions on the subject - link). Frankly, after reading the Brooklyn Investor post I became hesitant, which means it is a must read. John seems like a strong statistician to me but as someone said owls are not what they seem.. Eternal perspective assumes that it is unclear what people will think when profit margins shrink, which is inevitable. In other words, multiple is uncertain. I still tend to lean towards a bias against high margins, which is now happening at the same time with a high multiple.

Graham with 50% in cash (link) is thinking in the same direction but instead of cash my hedge is a more aggressive bet (short of indexes).

A brief and eclectic stock update: INFU looks interesting below $1.40 (for a brief moment). Gazprom below $8.00, too. Gas reserves cannot cost 80x cheaper than at CHK for a long. However, Russian element brings some shiver in me. Umom Rasiju neponiatj (link - loose translation: you can't fathom Russia with mind). I do not have positions in both, yet. Of my holdings, LOJN looks cheap, trading almost at cash.

INTERESTING FEELINGS

I have been silent for quite a long time. Do not have much to say, just to note that I remain bearish for no particular reason. It is probably nature of contrarian pretenders to think in the opposite direction than the majority.

Downtown Josh (I like his writings a lot) is pounding weekly how the tide is turning and the snowball starts rolling like a train. Even EU ongoing disaster and Chinese real estate bubble correction cannot even bump it. And nothing (known) in sight can change the situation. Josh probably wants to sound balanced and neutral but this how I feel after reading him.

I try to check my temper with John Hussman’s weekly musings. Last Monday, he once again produced the calm for me. Human beings really need to belong somewhere and to rationalize everything. In business cycles though it is crucial to synchronize ones expectations with the real pace of life.

All is not well but it is really painful to remain hedged. This pain gives me the feeling of rightness (check – do I have masochistic inclinations?). It is much much easier to go with the stream, like in March 2009 (meaning not to buy stocks at that time). There is huge assumption in the sky that economy is sustainable, the Fed will be able to stop printing and deficit will shrink; and who cares if this is not true…

Stocks are high and bonds are high. Are people taking profits? Is it smart to do that now? Most think that we will ride further up. Those who are afraid of bonds sell them and buy stocks but somebody is always on the other side of the trade. For some reason, somebody is doing the opposite: buying bond and selling stock. Or people earn money and send them to former owners of bonds and stocks, who hell knows what do with this cash. Really what matters is demand and supply – on both, general market and on the micro individual security level.

I am on the edge of initiating a significant position, 3x my normal position size, approaching 10% of net worth. It is a cable company which probably will enter reorganization and it’s debt now trades at ~2.5x EBITDA. I thought that writing about this will give me some courage, for it may be a long ride without daily quotes. In December, I almost bought it at 45, in two weeks it went up to 65 and now back to 50. YTM is >30% for the next 3 years (10% would be enough for me). What is not to like? Cable is an asset in bear or bull.

It is great to have a blog and confess to ones consciousness and others. Whoever that is.

SUSTAINABILITY OF HIGH MARGINS (CHECKLIST)

A significant part of the current bear thesis rests on the shoulders of supposedly "unsustainable profit margins". You have to seek truth in the opposite opinion (my view is that SPY should be around 1,000 rather than where it is at the moment) and I find that arguments in favor of high margins are quite hard to challenge. I decided to make a checklist and revisit it periodically to see if "argument" still sounds realistic. So, is it different this time?

==> US exported lower returning businesses (e.g. manufacturing) to other countries and kept the best pieces locally (pharmaceuticals, tech) (Mason Hawkins of Southeastern Asset Management - Link) = inflation of labor abroad is sending manufacturing jobs back (probably in yet irrelevant quantities);

==> accounting (minority stakes report just profits and no sales) (same source as above) = sounds logical;

==> effective tax rates are lower (probably partially explained by the above points) (David Bianco of Deutsche Bank - Link) = budgets are unbalanced, tax rates may go up, including foreign tax rates;

==> foreign sales and profits are higher (same source as above) = I do not know how he constructed the chart but as I understand, he is saying that the world is different outside of US; it could be simply a function of dollar depreciation;

==> interest rates are lower (same source as above) = this is clearly mean reverting.

This Link dated April 2012 gives a good illustration of how people tend to extrapolate.

I presented my views in the beginning but I want to stress that I am not pretend to anyhow time the market. I am just more cautious these days but an example of PCS shows that the crowd sometimes moves pretty fast in any environment.

I would be grateful for additional points to the checklist.

MARKET CONTEMPLATIONS (i)

Ray Dalio has a cool name and it seems that he understands how the Machine (or Mr. Market) works two thirds of the time. Not bad. He is an optimist as W. Buffett because he believes that the core multi century trend is a slow upwards move (2-3%). Then there are intermediary multi decade debt cycles and multi year mood (Fed imposed) swing cycles.

Situation is really bad in the world economy (as evidenced by Baltic Dry index below)...

... and a longer perspective...

..but the market seems to do not care and continues climbing up. What can derail it? Every time when Mr. Market is in doubt, central banks are pulling some new rabbit. Are there any left? At least it seems that they have some old ones, i.e. they can keep on extending the existing facilities (this is probably what Hugh Hendry calls going “nuclear”). There is no point of being angry on Bernanke because he is simply doing his job and Ray Dalio calls the outcome as “beautiful”.

The only credible answer on what can derail this climbing up is “what we do not know at the moment”. We know Portugal / Spain / etc EU, China, Japan, oil.  World is calm – volatility is down.

In Ken Fisher’s book “The Only Three Questions That Count” I found that S&P dropped 30%+ in 1937 because of recession triggered by capital spending & industrial production severe decline. Sounds very mundane but hard to fathom today.

Major indexes are overpriced as compared to the long term trend because of central bank actions. Will there be a run on a central bank or something very trivial like a butterfly flap?