Showing posts with label James Montier. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Montier. Show all posts

Monday, April 30, 2012

RANDOM MUSSINGS (i)

“Sell your losers and ride your winners” – that’s what James Montier was proposing in 2002 and probably now would recommend, too. (This is, by the way, a great place of his highly recommended writings – Link).

This dilemma tortured me for a long time and I wanted to share my thoughts.  Losers are not always bad investments. Actually, they are one of the best. Nobody likes them, i.e. there are clear willing sellers and for all kind of reasons, psychological and economic.

As it’s written, it has a very absolute meaning, very undemocratic.

Averaging down is a good thing and I am doing it routinely. As per his most recent annual review, Prem Watsa also likes it and calls it “long term value investing approach”. (Link, btw, his liking of RIM still puzzles me – I admit that I do not understand the odds in this particular case). You just have to practice it deliberately. Know the misjudgment and make conscious decision.

New facts (not emotion, not mood, not liking/disliking) and intrinsic value should guide you and not your brain’s asymmetric treatment of pains of loss and pleasures of gain. Each stock has a price and value. When discrepancy is big enough, you can strike.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

FOR BEGINNERS (PART VI)


II. c) Psychological Misjudgments

Human brain was designed to work in a wild world. Not that the present world is not wild but what was useful then may ruin you in the present day. You cannot rewire the brain, which seeks to help itself and regularly make shortcuts or automatic decisions without thinking (judgmental heuristics). That is what really useful for savvy sellers and very important to be aware of for investors.

Charlie Munger recommends knowing them by heart because the list is not long and this way the study would become applicable in practice (help to avoid problems).

I prepared a list of the most common and recurring misjudgments. The list really works for me - I memorized it and reread regularly. I know that I have similar points but with different framing – I thought that certain situations are easier to memorize as compared to dry theory.

In order to facilitate memorizing, I divided the list into 4 manageable sub-lists and I recommend devoting 15 minutes per day for each and in a week you will see the difference.

Before we go into the details, I would highly recommend the following links and books on the subject.

Charlie Munger’s Article on Psychology of Human Misjudgment - Link

Online Behavioral Finance Resource (very technical) - Link

Influence by Robert Cialdini - Link

Why Smart People Make Big Money Mistakes by Gary Belsky and Thomas Gilovich - Link

The Little Book of Behavioral Investing by James Montier - Link

List I

1. Mental Accounting. The key principle to remember: all money is equal. People tend to spent some money differently, e.g. inheritance, credit card or lottery winnings. If you play roulette and start with $1, then reach $100,000 and then lose it all. How much did you lose – most people will say that they lost a dollar.

2. Integrate Losses. Would you drive 4 blocks to get a lamp for $75 while at a store you are in it goes for $100? What if prices are $1,500 and $1,525? When you have a loss you prefer to hide it from yourself inside a bigger loss.

3. Asymmetry in Loss & Gain Treatment. A lost dollar is twice as painful as a gained dollar. That is how you avoid to get rid of your portfolio losers because until you sold it, it feels less painful. You start gambling with losers but are ultra conservative with winners. Scientifically, it is a part of a prospect theory and is called loss aversion and sunk cost fallacy.

4. Status Quo Bias. A variation of loss aversion. It may paralyze you, especially in the most important perceptively moment (decision paralysis).  You are simply avoiding a feeling of regret. This also explains why loss aversion can lead us to avoid or delay action. Addition of second good deal makes people less likely to take advantage of either opportunity. Remember March of 2009, when all had to invest while terrified and opportunities were plentiful (Link). How many dared to catch a falling knife?

5. Endowment Effect. People tend to overvalue what belongs to them - another manifestation of loss aversion and that is how trial periods and money back guarantees work. This explains why most people would demand at least twice as much to sell than they would to buy it.

6. Weber’s Law. The impact of change in the intensity of a stimulus is proportional to the absolute level of the original stimulus. When dealing about gain, difference between 0 and 500 is greater than between 500 and 1,000. When dealing about loss, difference between losing 500 and nothing is greater psychologically than that between losing 500 and losing 1,000.

Monday, March 26, 2012

INVESTING UPDATE (i)

This year I am trading a lot. Made 9 trades already (compared to 12 in the entire 2010 and 14 in 2009). Sold big 2011 winners (CRYP, INSW, TLB) and shorted XHL and IWO (R2000 Growth) last week to the tune of 40% of portfolio equity (in addition to 35% existing short ETFs).

With S&P @ 1,400, the market climbing a wall of worry (China, Europe, Japan, USA, oil/Iran) and profit margins at all time highs mainly fed by government deficits (James Montier of GMO – link), in support to mean reversion concept I decided to initiate a more aggressive hedging stance. It was painful to do, which gives a feeling of rightness.

I followed RSH for a long time and initiated 5% long position @ $7.06. The stock traded at this level back in 1982, 1984, 1990-1992, and 2009. Radio Shack will have to reinvent itself (between formats, hardware & service providers) once again but long term rear view mirror provides comfort for an investor with 2-3 year horizon. A vast convenience network must have higher value than 0.15x sales. The stock now is priced as if business would not generate any economic value in the future (priced at less than tangible equity) but it is making money. I would be happy if RSH delivers $0.5-0.6 EPS in 2012 (lower than consensus for what it is worth). In the meantime, it is paying 7.5% dividend and I plan to average down if RSH drops the dividend.

Other outstanding company longs are: CSC, CSCO, LOJN, IPAS, BRK.B, and GCA.

2011 Overview

2011 was exceptionally good generating 23% returns. I had small leverage, so equity returns were even larger. This was achieved despite having almost 50% of portfolio in SH and RWM (inverse S&P and Russell 2000 ETFs), which cost me dearly because of lack of diligence. A few spikes in intra year volatility knocked correlations down, which resulted in almost the same annual return for Russell 2000 and its supposedly inverse ETF of -5%. SPY and SH relationship was even worse – 0% (S&P) vs. -8% (SH). There are no limitations for human folly.

Fortunately, 4 holdings (KSP, INSW, CRYP, and TLB) were taken out during 2011 for quite a nice premium. Well, TLB is not acquired yet but it got a strong offer, which lead to my exit. At the end of 2010, I had only 6 company stocks (PCS and GCA in addition), so impact of takeouts was meaningful. Additionally, at the peak of EUR/USD in the end of April, I initiated 5% position in EUR/USD put option @ 1.45 maturing in January 2013 (via FXE), which generated 85% return in 2011. I plan to sell it on anniversary, and initiate a new 2-year option position.

Track Record

This spring is the 4th anniversary of my active practicing of value investing, which started after a few years of extensive theoretical preparation. I am all my conscious life in finance but this does not mean anything because real things started only around 2005.

So, how am I doing? 22 positions initiated in total, 4 closed losses (incl. 1 “hedge”), 3 open hedge losses, 1 open loss (RSH), 13.5% IRR (xIRR Google Finance function), 50% portfolio return, and average weighted xIRR of 32%.

Seems like quite a lot of things happened since the spring of 2008.